<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Saul Cozens' Web Technology Blog &#187; security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saulcozens.co.uk/tag/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saulcozens.co.uk</link>
	<description>Musings and dabblings in anything vaguely related to the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:48:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Verified by Visa &#8211; supporting phishing attacks</title>
		<link>http://saulcozens.co.uk/2008/11/22/verified-by-visa-supporting-phishing-attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://saulcozens.co.uk/2008/11/22/verified-by-visa-supporting-phishing-attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>saulcozens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online banking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saulcozens.co.uk/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, while making an online purchase, I was asked by a online store to opt-in to the Verified by Visa anti-fraud mechanism.  On face value this seemed like a very sensible thing to join up to.  All I have to do is provide a password of my choosing that I re-enter each time I make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, while making an online purchase, I was asked by a online store to opt-in to the Verified by Visa anti-fraud mechanism.  On face value this seemed like a very sensible thing to join up to.  All I have to do is provide a password of my choosing that I re-enter each time I make a purchase online using my Visa card.</p>
<p>The structure of the Verified by Visa (and its Mastercard equivalent, 3D-secure) means that an online seller will not be able to keep my credit card details and re-use them later (for nefarious purposes) as I only provide my password directly to Visa NOT to the seller themselves.</p>
<p>Great, I thought!  Until I noticed that the site that was asking me to setup my password (and I would presumably have to re-enter my password at a later date) did not identify itself in any meaningful way. Check it out for yourself <a href="https://www.securesuite.co.uk" target="_blank">https://www.securesuite.co.uk</a>.  Notice that the &#8216;site owner&#8217; does not appear in the Firefox/MSIE7 location bar and even if you examine the SSL certificate it seems to be registered to a company called CYOTA Inc. The only mention of &#8216;Verified by Visa&#8217; is buried in the Organisational Unit entry in the certificate.</p>
<p>Now we can obviously google our way to finding out that CYOTA Inc are owned by RSA who probably provide the systems for Verified by Visa, but really&#8230;</p>
<p>The whole process is predicated on the buyer knowing that they are providing their password to Visa and no-one else so I find it incredible that Visa, CYOTA and the issuing banks are not addressing the confusion they are causing.</p>
<p>Worse still they aren&#8217;t just confusing the public about Verified by Visa, they are also positively ENCOURAGING user to ignore the warning signs of phishing attacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://saulcozens.co.uk/2008/11/22/verified-by-visa-supporting-phishing-attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>passpack.com try out</title>
		<link>http://saulcozens.co.uk/2008/11/10/passpackcom-try-out/</link>
		<comments>http://saulcozens.co.uk/2008/11/10/passpackcom-try-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>saulcozens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passpack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truecrypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website passwords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saulcozens.co.uk/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been trying to find a way to manage my huge number of website passwords and perhaps store my private data.  I came across passpack.com a few days ago and thought I&#8217;d give it a try. After attempting to import my Firefox password list only to told that I had exceeded my allocated number of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to find a way to manage my huge number of website passwords and perhaps store my private data.  I came across <a href="http://passpack.com" target="_blank">passpack.com</a> a few days ago and thought I&#8217;d give it a try.</p>
<p>After attempting to import my Firefox password list only to told that I had exceeded my allocated number of of entries by -97 (yes, minus 97).  Hmmm!  a few emails back and forth to the (very helpful) Passpack support team, plus the dicovery that I have third party cookies turned off on Firefox (forgot that) and I got it up and running.</p>
<p>So do I like it?  Well it&#8217;s exactly what I wanted, but not actually what I need.  You see it forces me to be a bit too secure.  In order to login to a website without remembering the password, I have to:</p>
<ol>
<li>login to <a href="http://passpack.com" target="_blank">Passpack</a> &#8211; no problem it supports <a href="http://openid.net" target="_blank">openID</a> (and I can have &#8216;remember me&#8217; turned on my computers)</li>
<li>perform the humanity test (a nice one actually &#8211; just click the black square)</li>
<li>provide my packing key &#8211; which must be a fairly long and safe key.  This is slightly annoying as I am an incredibly bad typer and have trouble typing more than 2 keys in the right order at the best of times.  So trying to get a 20 character packing key right when I can&#8217;t see what I&#8217;ve typed takes numerous tries.</li>
<li>locate the appropriate entry for the site I wish to visit.</li>
<li>click the link to be forwarded to the site</li>
<li>click the &#8216;Passpack it!&#8217; bookmarklet (if I have the bookmark tool bat turned on &#8211; I don&#8217;t normally)</li>
<li>and there, Robert&#8217;s your mother&#8217;s live-in-lover.</li>
</ol>
<p>Now I know that this would probably be a lot easier if the domains in my password file (not sure why the don&#8217;t), but it&#8217;s all such a bloody palaver.  Compare that to the <a href="http://foxmarks.com" target="_blank">Foxmarks</a> experience:</p>
<ol>
<li>I go to the site I want to use</li>
<li>Firefox prefills my details</li>
</ol>
<p>Okay so there is a downside.</p>
<ul>
<li>I can&#8217;t store any data, just passwords</li>
<li>I can&#8217;t use other browsers</li>
<li>I can&#8217;t use a public access (or a friends) computer</li>
</ul>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m thinking that I&#8217;ll stick a copy of Firefox passwords on my <a href="http://www.truecrypt.org/" target="_blank">Truecrypt</a> encrypted USB key to cover most of those issues.  Sorry Passpack &#8211; but you&#8217;re just too secure for me!</p>
<p>Now if only <a href="http://foxmarks.com" target="_blank">Foxmarks</a> would support openID, I&#8217;d be have just one password to remember.  I&#8217;m not sure what I&#8217;m going to do about my accessing on my iPhone though!  Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://saulcozens.co.uk/2008/11/10/passpackcom-try-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secure logins that aren&#8217;t secure</title>
		<link>http://saulcozens.co.uk/2008/10/26/secure-logins-that-arent-secure/</link>
		<comments>http://saulcozens.co.uk/2008/10/26/secure-logins-that-arent-secure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>saulcozens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website passwords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saulcozens.co.uk/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m becoming more irritated by organisation who are failing to understand that their secure login systems are anything but. Any organisation provides me with a &#8216;secret&#8217; number or a passphrase (or restricts what passphrase I can use) that I have to remember to login is effectively putting my data at risk by forcing me to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m becoming more irritated by organisation who are failing to understand that their secure login systems are anything but.</p>
<p>Any organisation provides me with a &#8216;secret&#8217; number or a passphrase (or restricts what passphrase I can use) that I have to remember to login is effectively putting my data at risk by forcing me to write that passphrase down.  I can remember pin for my debit card and another one for my credit card, the password for my email is easy as I use it everyday), being asked to remember 2 more numbers (not of my choosing for an online account I use once every 6 months&#8230; Why would I?  How could I?  So I write it down&#8230; and remove any semblance of security!</p>
<p>If they can&#8217;t pick-up on the OpenID movement couldn&#8217;t they at least have the decency to let me choose my own damn password?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://saulcozens.co.uk/2008/10/26/secure-logins-that-arent-secure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
